¼­·Î.¾Ë¸² /// À̸§°ú ´äÀ» ¹ÞÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹ø°³±ÛÅëÀ» ¹àÈ÷°í ¾²±â ¹Ù¶ø´Ï´Ù


2001/04/03(14:20) from 210.123.35.44
ÀÛ¼ºÀÚ : ±Ý´©¸® Á¶È¸¼ö : 8720 , ÁÙ¼ö : 66
Re: Àηù°¡ ´Þ¿¡ °¬´Ù°í ... Á¶ÀÛÀÌ´Ù.?!

À²...ÀλçÇϸç...

1969.³â.7.¿ù.16.ÀÏ. >>> .20.ÀÏ.21ÀÏ.???.¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«.ºñÇà»ç.¾Ï½ºÆ®·ÕÀÌ.´Þ¿¡.ù¹ßÀ».µðµ±´Ù.ÇÏ¿©...
¿Â.¼¼»ó.»ç¶÷µéÀÌ.¼ûÀ».Á׿´´Ù...
±×.¶§.»ýÁß°è.¹æ¼ÛÀ̶ó´Â.°Í.¾Õ¿¡.³Ì.ÀÒÀº.¸ð½ÀµéÀÌ.³».´«.¾È¿¡.¶Ñ·ÈÇÏ´Ù...

±×µéÀÇ.¼±Á¶.ÄݷҺνº´Â...
¿À¹é³âÀü...¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä«¿¡.µµÂøÇÏ¿©...±×°÷À»...À嵶ó°í.ºÎ¸£°í...
±×°÷¿¡.»ç´Â.»ç¶÷µéÀ»...Àεµ»ç¶÷.indian.µéÀ̶ó°í...¿ì°å´Ù...
±×µéÀº.¾ÆÁ÷.±×·¸°Ô.ºÒ¸®¿î´Ù...

¿À´Ã...Ź±¸¸¦.´Þ¿¡.´øÁ®.º¸´Âµ¥.µå´Â.µ·Àº.¾ó¸¶Àϱî...
´Þ.±×¸²ÀÚ.Áö³ª´Â.U.ÇÑÁü.°ø.¸¸Á®.º¸±â...
°í¸¿...
³×.

ZLzlindian...
DT

ÀÌÀ² wrote:
> NASA debunks moon landing hoax conspiracy
> Did man really set foot on the moon?    
> February 19, 2001
> Web posted at: 12:54 PM EST (1754 GMT)



> RELATED SITES:
> Bad Astronomy.com
> NASA
>
> Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
> External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.



> Joe Smoman - Saturday, 03/31/01, 6:19:00pm (#933 of 940)
> Just to present another example, I'll use the same photo I used earlier with the astronaut standing beside a rock.
> It seems to help a great deal to use a magnifying glass. Once you see these things you no longer need the magnifying glass. They stick right out.
> Towards the bottom left of that photo there is something sticking out of the ground, its on a little mound. If you study it very closely you will see well defined steps leading up to the mound.
> That is actually some kind of tower or lighthouse. It has nothing at all to do with the astronauts.

> little tower on the mound



> Joe Smoman - Saturday, 03/31/01, 6:34:41pm (#934 of 940)
> This is another interesting Apollo 16 photo.
> You dont need a magnify glass to see this.
> Look directly to the astronauts left and there is a big round rock. The round rock has a vertical rectangular door. There also appears to be a radar dish sitting to the left of the round rock. Some argue thats the rovers dish, but from that short distance the rover would be clearly visible. Infact, from that short distance the rover would dwarf the rock. The rock is not very far away from the astronaut.
> Thats not a rock. Its a large round building with a door and other small structures (or decorations) sitting out front. If the surface really is a telephoto, that round building would have to be huge to show up that big.

> Round house with door



> Joe Smoman - Saturday, 03/31/01, 6:48:00pm (#937 of 940)
> Corey Hammer 3/31/01 6:39pm
>
> Nope looks like the rover to me. The whites in the image are washing out any contrast.
> It cant be the rover, because from that distance, the rover would be bigger than the rock.
> Heres an example. Look how far away the rover is and compare it to the other photo. There is no way the rover is sitting there.
> Rover from a distance


Modify Delete Post Reply Backward Forward List